Thursday, February 4, 2010

I wonder what the liberals would think of this?

Justice Thomas recently defended the Supreme Court ruling about campaign finance reform.

ustice Thomas responded to several questions from students at Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Fla., concerning the campaign finance case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. By a 5-to-4 vote, with Justice Thomas in the majority, the court ruled last month that corporations had a First Amendment right to spend money to support or oppose political candidates.

“I found it fascinating that the people who were editorializing against it were The New York Times Company and The Washington Post Company,” Justice Thomas said. “These are corporations.”

The part of the McCain-Feingold law struck down in Citizens United contained an exemption for news reports, commentaries and editorials. But Justice Thomas said that reflected a legislative choice rather than a constitutional principle.

“Go back and read why Tillman introduced that legislation,” Justice Thomas said, referring to Senator Benjamin Tillman. “Tillman was from South Carolina, and as I hear the story he was concerned that the corporations, Republican corporations, were favorable toward blacks and he felt that there was a need to regulate them.”

Well I guess I shouldn't be surprised Democrats support a law that was originally introduced to hurt blacks. I think it is a very sad thing it took over 100 years to repeal this law. But it's hard to over turn corrupt law when the liberals stand in the way.

No comments:

Post a Comment